Savvy Nickel LogoSavvy Nickel
Ctrl+K
The Little Book That Still Beats the Market
Value InvestingBeginner-Intermediate

The Little Book That Still Beats the Market

by Joel Greenblatt

4.4/5

Joel Greenblatt's magic formula ranks stocks by earnings yield and return on capital to systematically find cheap, high-quality businesses. Our review updates the backtest with 2017-2026 performance data showing the formula underperformed the S&P 500 in recent years.

Published 2005
218 pages
15 min read
Buy on Amazon
Share:

*Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend books we have personally read and genuinely believe in.

Quick Overview

Joel Greenblatt ran Gotham Capital from 1985 to 1994, averaging 40% annual returns. After returning outside capital, he spent years developing a systematic formula that could replicate the core logic of value investing without requiring deep security analysis. The result is the "magic formula," a two-factor ranking system using earnings yield and return on capital. The book is accessible enough for a teenager while rigorous enough to change how professionals think about systematic value. I have backtested variations of the formula myself, and the results reveal an uncomfortable truth: the formula worked brilliantly in its original 1988-2004 backtest period, but post-publication performance has been mixed. A 2017-2026 backtest shows the formula underperforming the S&P 500. This review separates the timeless insights from the parts that need updating.

Book Details

AttributeDetails
TitleThe Little Book That Still Beats the Market
AuthorJoel Greenblatt
PublisherWiley
Published2005 (Updated 2010)
Pages218
Reading LevelBeginner to Intermediate
Amazon Rating4.6/5 stars

Get Your Copy

Hardcover: Buy on Amazon

Kindle: Buy on Amazon

Audiobook: Buy on Amazon


About the Author

Joel Greenblatt founded Gotham Capital in 1985 with $7 million. He averaged 40% annualized returns over the next decade, one of the best records in hedge fund history. He later founded Gotham Asset Management and teaches the adjunct value and special situations investing class at Columbia Business School, continuing the tradition of Graham and Greenwald.

His book You Can Be a Stock Market Genius (1997) covers his specialty in special situations: spinoffs, mergers, restructurings. The Little Book That Still Beats the Market is his attempt to distill value investing into a formula anyone can follow.


The Magic Formula: Two Factors, One Ranking

Factor 1: Earnings Yield

Greenblatt uses earnings yield rather than P/E ratio because it allows direct comparison across companies with different capital structures:

Earnings Yield = EBIT / Enterprise Value

Where:

  • EBIT = Earnings Before Interest and Taxes (pre-financing earnings)
  • Enterprise Value = Market Cap + Total Debt - Cash
  • Using EBIT removes the effect of debt financing. Using enterprise value accounts for the full capital structure.

    Why this is better than P/E:

    CompanyMarket CapNet IncomeP/EEBITEnterprise ValueEarnings Yield
    A (no debt)$100M$10M10x$14M$100M14%
    B (heavy debt)$100M$10M10x$14M$200M7%

    Company B looks identical to A on P/E but is half as attractive because you are paying $200M for the same $14M in operating earnings. Earnings yield captures this correctly.

    Factor 2: Return on Capital

    Return on Capital = EBIT / (Net Fixed Assets + Net Working Capital)

    This measures how efficiently a business converts its invested capital into earnings. High ROIC businesses require less capital to grow and compound more efficiently.

    ROCBusiness Quality
    Below 10%Below cost of capital; value-destroying
    10-15%Average business
    15-25%Good business
    25-40%Excellent business
    Above 40%Exceptional franchise

    The Combined Ranking

  • Rank all stocks in the universe by earnings yield (highest = rank 1)
  • Rank all stocks by return on capital (highest = rank 1)
  • Add the two rankings for each stock
  • Buy the 20-30 stocks with the best combined rankings
  • Hold for one year, then sell and repeat
  • The logic: this systematically finds businesses that are both cheap (high earnings yield) and good (high return on capital). Graham found cheapness. Buffett found quality. The magic formula finds both simultaneously.


    The Original Backtest

    Greenblatt backtested the formula from 1988 to 2004 on the 3,500 largest U.S. stocks:

    Time PeriodMagic Formula ReturnS&P 500 Return
    1988-2004 (17 years)30.8% annually12.4% annually
    Rolling 1-year periodsBeat market in 76%-
    Rolling 3-year periodsBeat market in 95%-
    Rolling 5-year periodsBeat market in 97%-

    $10,000 invested for 17 years at 30.8% would have grown to over $1 million. At 12.4%, it would have grown to about $71,600. The formula produced 14x the wealth of the index.

    Why the Formula Works (and Will Continue to Work)

    Greenblatt explains that the magic formula works precisely because it is painful to follow. In any given year, the formula underperforms the market approximately 1 in 4 years. Over 2-3 year periods, it underperforms roughly 1 in 20 times.

    This intermittent underperformance causes most investors to abandon the formula during losing stretches, which reduces competition and preserves the premium.


    Post-Publication Performance: The Uncomfortable Truth

    The formula has received academic scrutiny since publication, and the results are mixed.

    Academic Replications

    StudyPeriodFinding
    Gray & Vogel (2012)1964-2011Magic formula beats market by 5%/year
    Carlisle (2012)1970-2010Earnings yield alone beats combined formula
    Greenblatt's Gotham funds2009-2023Gross alpha of 3-5% annually (net fees lower)

    The 2017-2026 Backtest

    A recent backtest ran a version of the magic formula from 2017 through early 2026 with survivorship bias removed (delisted companies kept in the record at last traded price):

    MetricMagic FormulaS&P 500
    Total return (2017-2026)246.72%280.56%
    CAGR~13.89%~15.01%
    Initial $100K ending value$346,718$380,564

    The formula underperformed the S&P 500 over this 9.5-year window. The S&P 500 led for most of the period.

    Year-by-year results show the pattern:

    YearMagic FormulaS&P 500
    2017$124,988$119,085
    2018$125,002$126,396
    2019$132,369$146,987
    2020$139,463$174,481
    2021$156,114$217,771
    2022$176,194$199,907
    2023$198,850$228,834
    2024$265,197$304,392
    2025$289,694$347,832
    2026$346,718$380,564

    Source: SledgeKey Backtests

    The formula beat the S&P in 2017 but fell behind in 2019-2021 as growth stocks dominated. It narrowed the gap in 2022 when value recovered, then fell behind again as the AI-driven growth rally resumed.

    Why the Formula Has Struggled

    An analysis identifies three structural shifts:

    1. The business landscape has changed. The largest companies by market cap are now software, semiconductor, and platform businesses (Microsoft, Apple, Nvidia, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta). These companies have tiny tangible asset bases relative to their earnings power. Their ROIC numbers, when computed the magic formula way (EBIT / (NWC + Net Fixed Assets)), are astronomical. Microsoft screens at 300%+ ROIC. They look cheap on the formula's metrics even at multi-trillion-dollar valuations.

    Meanwhile, traditional cheap-on-EV/EBIT stocks are dominated by energy, deeply cyclical industrials, and old-economy retailers. These names have compressed margins and secular headwinds. The formula scoops them up because the math says they are cheap, but the qualitative reality is different.

    2. Passive index fund dominance. In 2005, passive index funds held roughly 20% of U.S. equity AUM. Today the share is over 50%. Passive flows mechanically bid up large-cap names regardless of fundamental value. Stocks that should be cheap on magic formula metrics get no passive bid, so they stay cheap or get cheaper. The mean-reversion that the formula depends on takes longer to materialize.

    3. Quantitative funds compete on the same screen. Dozens of quant funds now run Greenblatt-style strategies monthly rather than annually, with additional filters and institutional capital. This compresses the alpha for retail investors running the original formula.

    The 2025 Value Resurgence: A Partial Recovery

    The 2025 data offers some hope for formula adherents. Value was the best-performing factor globally in 2025, according to the Morningstar Factor Monitor Q4 2025. The Morningstar Global Value Factor Index posted strong performance, backed by intrasector stock selection in technology, financial services, and industrials.

    A 50-year factor study shows the HML factor delivered 4.2% annualized returns from 2020-2025, after a -2.1% annualized return in 2010-2019. The value premium has not disappeared; it has compressed and become more cyclical.


    The Simple and Advanced Formula

    Simple Version (for most investors)

    Use magicformulainvesting.com (Greenblatt's free website):

  • Set minimum market cap ($50M+)
  • Get the list of top-ranked stocks
  • Buy 5-7 stocks per month until you own 20-30 positions
  • After 12 months, sell each position (handling taxes efficiently)
  • Repeat indefinitely
  • For taxable accounts, hold winners slightly past the one-year mark (long-term capital gains rate) and sell losers slightly before the one-year mark (short-term loss for maximum tax benefit).

    Advanced Version: Adding Qualitative Filters

    Greenblatt acknowledges the formula is improved by adding simple qualitative screens:

  • Exclude financial companies (banks, insurance: capital structure is fundamentally different)
  • Exclude utilities (regulated returns distort ROIC)
  • Exclude foreign ADRs (accounting standards vary)
  • Add a quick check: is there an obvious reason the stock is cheap that suggests permanent impairment?
  • The last filter is the most important. If a company is cheap because its industry is structurally declining, the low ranking is a warning, not an opportunity.

    Modern Improvements

    Some practitioners have proposed updates to improve the formula's performance in the current market:

  • Use 3-year average EBIT rather than trailing twelve months to reduce the "buy peak earnings" failure mode
  • Apply a minimum $500M market cap filter to avoid micro-caps where bid-ask spreads eat the alpha
  • Cap single positions at 5% of portfolio rather than equal weighting
  • Exclude pure-cyclical commodity producers (oil drillers, dry-bulk shipping) that score well at cyclical peaks then crash
  • Apply the formula globally (U.S. + Europe + Asia developed) for less crowding

  • Key Concepts Explained for Beginners

    Why Stocks Have Value

    Greenblatt explains stocks as ownership in real businesses with impressive clarity: when you own a share of stock, you own a proportionate share of a business. That means you are entitled to your share of all the earnings that business generates in the future.

    He uses a small business example: if you bought a store that earned $1,200 per year for $6,000 (5 P/E), that is a 20% earnings yield. You can evaluate whether that is a good price by comparing it to alternatives (savings account at 3%, bonds at 5%, other stores at different prices).

    This reframing, stocks as pieces of businesses with definable earnings yields, cuts through the noise of market commentary.

    Mr. Market as a Gift

    Greenblatt's version of Graham's Mr. Market allegory: a business partner who offers to sell you his half of the business at a new price every day. Some days the price is very high; some days very low. You can either buy more, sell your share, or ignore him.

    The key: daily price changes do not change the value of the underlying business. Only the fundamentals change its value. Mr. Market's mood is irrelevant unless you choose to trade with him.


    Strengths & Weaknesses

    What We Loved

  • Clearest explanation of earnings yield in any investing book
  • Systematic approach removes behavioral errors from execution
  • Historical backtest data is thorough and honestly presented
  • Accessible to non-finance readers without sacrificing intellectual rigor
  • Greenblatt's intellectual honesty about limitations and behavioral challenges
  • The Mr. Market allegory remains the best explanation of market volatility for beginners
  • Areas for Improvement

  • Formula performance has weakened since publication: 2017-2026 backtest shows underperformance vs S&P 500
  • The original ROIC calculation (EBIT / tangible assets) produces distorted results for asset-light and software businesses
  • Tax inefficiency in taxable accounts due to annual turnover
  • No guidance on position sizing beyond 20-30 equal-weight positions
  • Ignores balance sheet quality: highly leveraged companies can score well
  • No discussion of how passive index fund dominance (over 50% of AUM) disrupts the mean-reversion the formula depends on
  • The formula's concentration in cyclical sectors (energy, financials, retailers) at cyclical peaks creates value trap risk

  • Who Should Read This Book

  • Investors who want a systematic, rules-based approach to value
  • People who want to understand why value investing works before implementing it
  • Finance students who want the clearest available explanation of earnings yield
  • Anyone curious about quantitative value strategies
  • Probably Not For

  • Committed passive index investors
  • Investors unable to tolerate multi-year underperformance
  • Those in taxable accounts where annual turnover creates significant tax drag

  • Comparison to Similar Books

    BookFocusApproachBest For
    The Little Book That Still Beats the MarketSystematic valueTwo-factor formulaRules-based value investing
    The Little Book of Value Investing (Browne)Value investingQualitative + quantitativeStock-picking framework
    The Intelligent Investor (Graham)Value investing philosophyQualitativeFoundational framework
    You Can Be a Stock Market Genius (Greenblatt)Special situationsEvent-drivenAdvanced opportunities

    Read The Little Book That Still Beats the Market for the systematic approach. Read The Little Book of Value Investing for the qualitative framework. Read You Can Be a Stock Market Genius for special situations.


    Implementation Guide

    Using the Magic Formula in 2026

    Step 1: Choose your account type

  • The formula works best in tax-advantaged accounts (Roth IRA, 401k) where annual turnover does not create tax drag
  • Use our 401k calculator to maximize your tax-advantaged contributions
  • In taxable accounts, the annual turnover can reduce net returns by 1-2% per year
  • Step 2: Decide between the formula and value ETFs

  • If you want the original formula: use magicformulainvesting.com for stock lists
  • If you want a passive approximation: use value factor ETFs (QVAL, IVAL, VTV, VIOV)
  • Value ETFs capture much of the value premium without the transaction costs and tax drag of individual stock management
  • Step 3: Apply modern filters

  • Exclude financials, utilities, and foreign ADRs (as Greenblatt recommends)
  • Add a minimum $500M market cap filter to avoid illiquid micro-caps
  • Use 3-year average EBIT rather than trailing twelve months to smooth cyclical peaks
  • Check our guide on value traps before buying any formula stock
  • Step 4: Build the portfolio gradually

  • Buy 5-7 stocks per month over 4-5 months to build 20-30 positions
  • Equal weight or cap at 5% per position
  • No more than 25% in any single sector
  • Step 5: Hold for one year, then rebalance

  • Sell losers slightly before the one-year mark for tax-loss harvesting
  • Sell winners slightly after the one-year mark for long-term capital gains treatment
  • Rebalance into the new top-ranked stocks
  • Step 6: Be prepared for multi-year underperformance

  • The formula underperformed the S&P 500 from 2017-2026
  • The 2010-2019 value drought lasted a full decade before reversing
  • If you cannot tolerate 3-5 years of underperformance, use a value ETF instead and automate monthly contributions
  • Use our investment calculator to model different scenarios

  • Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: Does the magic formula still work today?

    A: The 2017-2026 backtest shows the formula underperforming the S&P 500 by about 1% annually. The formula's edge has compressed since publication due to three factors: the changing business landscape (asset-light companies distort ROIC), passive index fund dominance (over 50% of AUM), and quant fund competition. The underlying logic (buy cheap, high-quality businesses) remains sound, but the mechanical implementation needs updating. Value was the best-performing factor in 2025, offering hope that the formula's cyclical underperformance may be reversing.

    Q: Can I implement it in a Roth IRA?

    A: Yes, and this is ideal. Tax-free growth eliminates the annual capital gains friction from portfolio turnover. The formula works best in tax-advantaged accounts.

    Q: What is the minimum capital needed?

    A: To own 20-30 positions with meaningful amounts, approximately $10,000-$20,000 is practical. Below that, transaction costs eat into returns. Many brokers now offer zero-commission trades, which has lowered this threshold.

    Q: Is there an ETF that implements the formula?

    A: Several value ETFs implement similar factor combinations. QVAL and IVAL target quality-value combinations. VTV and VIOV provide broad value exposure. These provide the exposure without the transaction costs of individual stock management. Greenblatt's Gotham funds implement variations of the strategy with long/short positioning.

    Q: Should I use the formula or just buy a value ETF?

    A: For most investors, a value ETF is the better choice. It captures most of the value premium, requires no ongoing effort, and avoids the tax drag from annual turnover. The formula is worth trying if you enjoy the process of stock selection and have a tax-advantaged account. Read our guide on index fund investing for a comparison of approaches.


    Final Verdict

    Rating: 4.4/5

    The Little Book That Still Beats the Market is the clearest explanation of systematic value investing ever written. Its magic formula is elegant, its explanation of earnings yield is unsurpassed in accessibility, and its honest discussion of behavioral challenges makes it more useful than most books that oversell their strategies. The 2017-2026 backtest showing underperformance versus the S&P 500 is a legitimate concern, but it reflects structural changes in the market (passive dominance, asset-light business models) rather than a flaw in the underlying logic. Value was the best-performing factor in 2025, suggesting the formula's cyclical underperformance may be reversing. Essential reading for any investor considering a rules-based value approach, with the caveat that the mechanical implementation needs updating for the current market structure.

    Get Your Copy

    Hardcover: Buy on Amazon

    Kindle: Buy on Amazon

    Audiobook: Buy on Amazon

    Prices current as of publication date. Free shipping available with Prime.

    Topics

    #book-review#joel-greenblatt#magic-formula#value-investing#systematic-investing#quantitative-value#gotham-asset-management

    Get Your Copy

    Support Savvy Nickel by purchasing through our affiliate link.

    Buy on Amazon

    Related Articles