*Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend books we genuinely believe in.
Quick Overview
Jonathan Clements spent 18 years writing the "Getting Going" personal finance column at The Wall Street Journal. How to Think About Money is his distillation of everything he learned — not a checklist of financial tactics, but a framework for reorienting how you think about money's relationship to happiness, time, and life satisfaction. At 148 pages it is remarkably concise and can be read in an afternoon, but its insights are among the most enduring in any personal finance book.
Book Details
| Attribute | Details |
|---|
| Title | How to Think About Money |
| Author | Jonathan Clements |
| Publisher | Self-published via CreateSpace |
| Published | 2016 |
| Pages | 148 |
| Reading Level | Beginner |
| Amazon Rating | 4.6/5 stars |
Get Your Copy
Paperback: Buy on Amazon
Kindle: Buy on Amazon
About the Author
Jonathan Clements wrote for The Wall Street Journal from 1990 to 2008 and was the personal finance columnist for the Sunday edition. He subsequently joined Citigroup's financial education division and later founded the HumbleDollar website, which continues to publish personal finance essays from practitioners and academics. He is widely regarded as one of the clearest and most honest voices in personal finance writing.
The Five Core Ideas
Clements organizes the book around five interconnected ideas that together constitute a philosophy of money management:
Idea 1: Your Life Is Like Running a Small Business
You are the CEO of your own financial enterprise. Your human capital (future earning power) is your most valuable asset. Your investment portfolio is a secondary asset. Managing both well requires thinking like a business owner.
The human capital balance sheet:
| Asset | Approximate Value |
|---|
| Human capital (discounted future earnings) | $1M-$3M for most careers |
| Home equity | $100K-$500K (typical) |
| Investment portfolio | Varies; often much smaller than human capital |
Most financial advice focuses on the investment portfolio — the smallest asset for most people under 50. Clements argues that career decisions, education investments, and income growth deserve at least as much attention.
The career risk framework:
Your human capital has a risk profile similar to a specific asset class:
Government employee: bond-like (stable, predictable, inflation-protected)Sales professional: equity-like (volatile, correlated with economic cycles)Entrepreneur: venture capital-like (binary outcomes; potentially enormous or zero)Matching your portfolio to your human capital risk:
A public school teacher (bond-like income) can afford more equity risk in her investment portfolio — her income is her bond allocation. A sales professional with volatile commission income already has significant equity-like exposure and should own more bonds in the portfolio for balance.
This framework, rarely articulated in personal finance books, has significant practical implications for asset allocation.
Idea 2: Two Great Enemies: Financial Markets and Yourself
The market as adversary:
Markets price securities efficiently enough that beating them consistently after costs is very difficult. The evidence is overwhelming: most active managers underperform their benchmarks after fees over long periods, and even those who outperform do so inconsistently.
Clements's conclusion: stop trying to beat the market. Buy low-cost index funds and let the market work for you rather than against you.
The cost of active management:
| Management Approach | Typical Annual Cost | Long-Run Wealth Impact |
|---|
| Active mutual fund | 1.0-1.5% | Enormous over decades |
| Index fund | 0.03-0.10% | Minimal |
| Full-service advisor (AUM) | 1.0-1.5% | Enormous over decades |
| Fee-only advisor | $1,000-$5,000/year flat | Minimal (worthwhile for advice) |
The 1% cost calculation:
On a $500,000 portfolio, 1% annually = $5,000/year. Over 20 years at 7% growth, the portfolio with 1% higher cost grows to $1.37M vs. $1.85M without the cost — a $480,000 difference. The cost of active management is not small; it is enormous.
Yourself as adversary:
The behavioral biases that cause investors to buy high and sell low, over-trade, and chase recent performance cost the average equity fund investor approximately 1.5% per year relative to simply holding the fund through market cycles (the "behavior gap," documented by DALBAR).
The combined enemy:
Active management costs + behavioral mistakes = 2-3% annual drag. Over a 30-year career, this can cut final wealth by 40-60% relative to simply owning index funds and staying the course.
Idea 3: Spend on Experiences, Not Things
The hedonic treadmill is the well-documented psychological phenomenon where material possessions quickly become the new baseline, no longer generating sustained happiness.
Why experiences produce more lasting satisfaction than things:
| Reason | Description |
|---|
| Adaptation | Material things become background quickly; experiences remain as memories |
| Social sharing | Experiences are shared and retold; things are compared and competed |
| Anticipation | Looking forward to an experience provides pleasure before it occurs |
| Identity | We are what we do; experiences contribute to our sense of self |
| Uniqueness | Experiences are one-of-a-kind; things can be replicated or replaced |
The research evidence:
Thomas Gilovich's research at Cornell showed that people reported higher lasting satisfaction from experiential purchases than material ones, even when evaluating them years later. The gap widened over time — material possessions lost relative satisfaction while experiences gained through memory and meaning.
The practical application:
When allocating discretionary spending, prioritize:
Travel and adventuresDining with important peopleLearning new skillsLive performance and eventsFamily experiences with childrenOver:
Upgraded cars beyond basic reliability needsLarger houses than necessary for genuine comfortFashion and accessories as status signalsConsumer electronics beyond functional needsThis is not deprivation — it is spending on the categories that reliably produce lasting happiness rather than temporary satisfaction that quickly fades.
Idea 4: Try to Be Happy Now
Clements presents a nuanced view on the balance between current consumption and future financial security that most personal finance books miss.
The deferred gratification trap:
Standard personal finance advice: sacrifice now so you can enjoy later. Save 15-20% of income, live below your means, delay gratification for decades.
This is generally good advice — but Clements identifies an important limit: people who defer everything to the future risk two regrets:
The sacrifice regret: You gave up experiences and relationships during your peak years for a financial goal you may not live to enjoy, or may not enjoy as much as anticipatedThe adequacy regret: You deferred so much that your peak earning years were unpleasant, and you arrive at retirement unable to remember why you did itThe balance:
Save enough for genuine financial security (10-15% minimum of income)But also spend enough on current life quality to make today worth livingPrioritize experiences and relationships that become more difficult with ageDo not treat every current enjoyment as morally suspectThe money-happiness research:
The Nobel-winning research by Kahneman and Deaton found that day-to-day emotional well-being rises with income up to approximately $75,000 per year (now updated to ~$100,000 in more recent research), then plateaus. Life satisfaction continues to rise with income above this level, but moment-to-moment happiness does not.
What this means practically:
Above a certain income threshold, additional money provides life satisfaction (the feeling that your life is going well) but not additional happiness in daily life. Most of daily happiness is determined by:
Quality of relationshipsMeaningful work or activityPhysical health and activitySense of purposeControl over how you spend your timeMoney enables the latter (control over time) but does not directly provide the others.
Idea 5: Forget Financial Independence — Focus on Work You Love
Clements's most contrarian idea: chasing early retirement may be the wrong goal.
The work-as-meaning argument:
Work provides:
Structure (a reason to get up and produce)Identity (I am what I contribute)Social connection (colleagues; professional community)Accomplishment (I made something happen)Intellectual challenge (hard problems to solve)Early retirement eliminates all of these simultaneously. For many people, the result is not freedom — it is purposelessness.
The better goal:
Rather than escaping work, find work you would choose to do even if money were not a constraint. This may require:
Career changes toward more meaningful but possibly lower-paying workPartial retirement (part-time meaningful work)Entrepreneurship in areas of genuine interestVolunteer roles that provide similar psychological benefits as paid workThe financial independence as insurance framework:
Clements reframes financial independence not as a destination (stop working) but as insurance (financial security that enables you to leave bad situations without immediate financial crisis).
Having 1-2 years of expenses saved creates enormous career freedom even without full financial independence:
Leave a toxic job without immediate crisisTake a risk on a career changeSay no to unethical requests from employersNegotiate from a position of strengthFull FI (25x expenses) is not required for most of these benefits — a much smaller cushion provides most of the freedom.
The Investment Philosophy
Despite the book's philosophical focus, Clements provides clear, concise investment guidance:
The Simple Portfolio
Core holdings:
| Asset | Vehicle | Allocation |
|---|
| U.S. stocks | Total Market Index Fund | 40-60% |
| International stocks | Total International Index Fund | 20-30% |
| Bonds | Total Bond Market Index Fund | 10-30% |
| REITs (optional) | REIT Index Fund | 0-10% |
The allocation between stocks and bonds should reflect both:
Your human capital risk profile (stable income = more equity; volatile income = more bonds)Your time horizon (longer = more equity; shorter = more bonds)Your psychological risk tolerance (can you hold through 50% declines without selling?)The rebalancing rule:
Rebalance when any asset class drifts 5% or more from its target allocation — no more frequently than annually, no less frequently than every 3 years.
The Behavioral Rules
| Rule | Rationale |
|---|
| Never check portfolio more than quarterly | Reduces loss-aversion trigger frequency |
| Pre-commit to not selling during crashes | Prevents crystallizing temporary losses |
| Automate all contributions | Removes willpower from the equation |
| Do not look at statements during bear markets | What you don't see, you don't act on irrationally |
Why This Book Is Different
Most personal finance books are tactical: here is how to budget, here is how to invest, here is how to cut costs. Clements's book is philosophical: here is how to think about money's relationship to your life.
The comparison:
| Book | Focus |
|---|
| I Will Teach You to Be Rich (Sethi) | Tactical: automate, invest, negotiate |
| The Simple Path to Wealth (Collins) | Strategic: index funds, savings rate |
| Die With Zero (Perkins) | Experiential: spend on experiences before you can't |
| How to Think About Money (Clements) | Philosophical: reframe money's role in a good life |
All four are valuable. Clements's is the most useful for people who have already implemented the basics but are unsure whether they are optimizing for the right things.
Strengths & Weaknesses
What We Loved
The most concise personal finance philosophy in print at 148 pagesHuman capital as the primary asset is an insight that reshapes financial planningExperiences vs. things is research-backed and practically applicableThe "forget FI" contrarianism offers a genuinely different and useful perspectiveClements's writing is clear, honest, and free of the promotional tone common in personal financeAreas for Improvement
Very short — some important topics are treated too brieflyLimited quantitative detail on investing mechanics (intentionally; but some readers will want more)The "work you love" advice can feel glib for those in limited labor marketsSelf-published — lighter editorial production than major publishers
Who Should Read This Book
Highly Recommended For
Anyone who has read the tactical personal finance books and wants the philosophical frameworkPeople who have achieved financial security but feel unclear about what they are working towardThose questioning whether early retirement is the right goal for themAnyone who wants the clearest possible statement of "why does any of this matter?"Probably Not For
Complete beginners who need the basic mechanics of budgeting and investing firstThose seeking specific investment strategy guidance
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is this better than The Psychology of Money?
A: Complementary and similar in spirit. Housel's book is broader and more narrative-driven with more investment psychology. Clements's book is more focused on the life-and-happiness implications of financial decisions. Both are worth reading; they reinforce each other.
Q: Do I need to read this if I've already implemented basic financial plans?
A: Especially valuable if you already have the basics in place. The philosophical questions Clements raises — what are you actually optimizing for, is FI the right goal, are you spending on the right things — are most relevant to people who have already answered the tactical questions.
Final Verdict
Rating: 4.5/5
How to Think About Money is the most concise and profound personal finance philosophy book available. Its human capital framework, experiences-vs.-things analysis, and questioning of financial independence as an end goal are uniquely valuable. Read it after the tactical basics are in place to reorient why you are doing any of it.
Get Your Copy
Paperback: Buy on Amazon
Kindle: Buy on Amazon
Prices current as of publication date. Free shipping available with Prime.