Savvy Nickel LogoSavvy Nickel
Ctrl+K
Devil Take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation
Financial HistoryIntermediate

Devil Take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation

by Edward Chancellor

4.6/5

Edward Chancellor's brilliant history of speculative manias from 17th-century Amsterdam to the dot-com bubble. A scholarly yet gripping account of how speculation has driven both financial innovation and catastrophic crashes throughout history.

Published 1999
368 pages
11 min read
Buy on Amazon

*Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend books we genuinely believe in.

Quick Overview

Edward Chancellor is a financial journalist and historian who wrote Devil Take the Hindmost as the dot-com bubble was inflating — an act of extraordinary prescience. The book traces speculative manias from 17th-century Amsterdam through South Sea, Mississippi, railroad, 1920s, and Japanese bubbles to the emerging internet mania. Chancellor demonstrates that speculation is not a modern aberration but a persistent feature of capitalist economies — and that the specific patterns of each mania are remarkably consistent across four centuries.

Book Details

AttributeDetails
TitleDevil Take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation
AuthorEdward Chancellor
PublisherPlume
Published1999
Pages368
Reading LevelIntermediate
Amazon Rating4.5/5 stars

Get Your Copy

Paperback: Buy on Amazon

Kindle: Buy on Amazon


About the Author

Edward Chancellor is a financial journalist, historian, and investment advisor. After writing Devil Take the Hindmost, he worked as a financial strategist at GMO (Jeremy Grantham's firm) where he wrote extensively on investment bubbles and valuation. He is the author of The Price of Time (2022), a comprehensive history of interest rates. He is widely regarded as one of the best historical analysts of speculative markets.


The Anatomy of a Speculative Mania

Chancellor identifies consistent characteristics across every speculative mania in history:

The Preconditions

1. Easy credit: Every major mania was preceded by an expansion of credit that made speculation more accessible.

2. A genuine new opportunity: Manias rarely occur around purely fraudulent opportunities. The railroads were genuinely transformative. The internet genuinely changed commerce. Japanese land scarcity was real. The speculative excess builds on a true foundation.

3. A plausible narrative: Each mania develops a story that explains why this time is different — why old valuation metrics do not apply and new ones are needed.

4. New participants: Retail investors who have no experience with the cycle's darker phase enter near the peak, having seen only the gains.

The Development Pattern

StageCharacteristics
Quiet accumulationInformed early investors buy as credit expands
Public excitementMedia coverage increases; narrative spreads
Mass participationRetail investors enter; new financial products created
EuphoriaValuations detach from fundamentals; skeptics dismissed
DistributionInformed investors exit; maintain appearances of commitment
CollapseCredit contracts; forced selling; narrative collapses
AftermathFraud exposed; regulations enacted; industry restructured

The Historical Manias

Amsterdam: The World's First Stock Exchange (1630s-1690s)

Amsterdam created the institutional infrastructure for modern capitalism: the world's first joint-stock company (VOC, 1602), the world's first securities exchange (1611), short selling, options, futures, margin lending, and market manipulation. All the features of modern markets existed in 17th-century Amsterdam.

The tulip mania (1634-1637):

Chancellor's tulip account goes deeper than most. The mania occurred in a specific context:

  • An outbreak of bubonic plague had killed significant portions of the population
  • Surviving heirs had inherited unusual wealth
  • A new commodity (tulip bulbs with unusual color patterns from a virus) was genuinely scarce and genuinely prized by the wealthy
  • A futures market developed that allowed speculation on bulbs not yet in existence
  • The futures market was the crucial innovation: it allowed speculation far beyond the physical supply of bulbs. Contracts on future-delivery bulbs circulated among speculators who had no intention of taking physical delivery — pure financial speculation on price.

    The collapse:

    In February 1637, a routine bulb auction in Haarlem failed to attract buyers at the asking price. Word spread. Within days, the entire futures market collapsed. Most contracts were never fulfilled. The Dutch legal system, overwhelmed by the volume of contract disputes, ultimately refused to enforce many of the futures contracts — treating them as gambling debts.

    The enduring lessons:

  • Futures markets can sustain speculation far beyond physical supply constraints
  • When futures contracts are not legally enforceable, counterparty risk is unlimited
  • Mass speculative manias can develop for apparently trivial assets if the social and credit context is right
  • The South Sea Bubble (1720)

    Chancellor provides the most thorough account of the South Sea Bubble available in a popular book.

    The structural mechanics:

    The South Sea Company was granted a monopoly on British trade with South America. The real business never amounted to much — Spain controlled South America and had no interest in granting access to British traders. The real business was financial engineering: the company was converting British government debt into South Sea shares.

    The convertibility mechanism:

    Britain's government had accumulated enormous debt from the wars of the previous two decades. The South Sea Company offered to take over this debt in exchange for shares. Holders of government bonds could exchange them for South Sea shares. The company's profits (ostensibly from the trade monopoly) would service the converted debt.

    Why the price spiral:

    The company itself controlled the share price during the conversion phase. It lent money to buyers of its own shares (using the shares as collateral). Rising share prices made the collateral more valuable, allowing more lending, which funded more buying, which drove prices higher. A perfectly circular price inflation that required continuously rising prices to function.

    When the circle broke:

    When the directors began selling their own shares in August 1720, the market detected the distribution. The Bank of England refused to extend further credit. The price collapsed from £1,000 to £150 within weeks.

    The human consequences:

  • Thousands of small investors lost their life savings
  • Isaac Newton, who had initially sold at a profit and then re-entered, lost £20,000
  • Parliament passed the Bubble Act, restricting joint-stock company formation — a law that hampered legitimate business formation for over a century
  • The investment lesson:

    When insiders begin selling while publicly encouraging buying, distribution is underway. The specific mechanism (share lending, convertibility) can make this difficult to detect. Watching for insider selling relative to insider buying is a valuable signal.

    The Railroad Manias (1825, 1845, 1860s, 1890s)

    Chancellor is among the first historians to document that there were multiple distinct railroad manias, not just one. Each mania funded genuine railroad construction. Each also massively overbuilt routes and overpriced securities. Each ended in widespread bankruptcy.

    The pattern:

    PhaseActivity
    InnovationFirst railways prove commercially viable
    EnthusiasmProjectors propose hundreds of new lines
    Parliamentary approvalGovernment authorizes most proposed lines
    Capital raisingShare subscriptions oversubscribed
    Construction frenzyTens of thousands of workers employed
    Rate warsToo many lines compete for traffic
    BankruptcyMost lines cannot service their construction debt
    ReorganizationStrongest lines absorb weaker ones at distressed prices

    The railroad investors who did best were not those who bought the original shares at peak enthusiasm — they were those who bought the reorganized companies' bonds at distressed prices after the crash.

    Application to modern technology:

    The internet bubble of 1995-2000 followed this pattern precisely. Enormous overinvestment in fiber optic infrastructure. Most companies went bankrupt. The fiber, however, remained — purchased in bankruptcy by successors who deployed it at zero marginal cost. The technological transformation was real; the share prices at peak were not justified.

    The 1920s and the 1929 Crash

    Chancellor's account of the 1920s mania is enriched by comparison to the earlier manias:

    New financial products of the 1920s:

  • Investment trusts (closed-end funds with leverage)
  • Instalment credit (buying on margin)
  • Holding companies (complex pyramids of ownership)
  • The leverage amplification:

    Investment trusts of the 1920s used leverage — borrowing to increase their share portfolios. When the market rose 50%, a 2x leveraged trust rose 100%. When the market fell 50% in 1929-1932, a 2x leveraged trust was wiped out.

    Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation:

    Goldman created multiple investment trusts in 1929, raising money from the public and investing it in other investment trusts (including other Goldman trusts). When the crash came, this pyramid of leverage amplified losses spectacularly. Goldman Sachs's reputation did not recover until after World War II.

    The Japanese Bubble (1985-1990)

    Japan's experience provides the most instructive modern case study because it combined stock market and real estate mania simultaneously — and the aftermath (the "Lost Decade") shows what happens when policy fails to address the bust.

    The scale of Japanese asset inflation (1985-1990):

    AssetPrice Change
    Tokyo Stock Exchange (Nikkei)+238%
    Tokyo commercial real estate+300%+
    Imperial Palace groundsEstimated value: more than entire California

    At peak, the total notional value of all Japanese real estate was five times the total value of all U.S. real estate, despite Japan being 1/25th the land area.

    The crash:

    The Bank of Japan raised rates in 1989. The Nikkei peaked at 38,916 in December 1989. By August 1992 it had fallen to 14,309 — a 63% decline. Real estate followed more slowly but fell equally dramatically.

    The aftermath — the Lost Decade:

    Japan's policy response to the bust was inadequate:

  • Banks were not forced to recognize bad loans (zombie banks)
  • Interest rates were cut but transmission was blocked by bank balance sheet problems
  • Fiscal stimulus was inadequate and poorly targeted
  • Japan's Nikkei did not recover its 1989 peak for 35 years — until 2024. Real estate in many areas never recovered.

    The investment lesson:

    Asset price bubbles of sufficient size can produce multi-decade recoveries. The Great Depression, Japan's Lost Decade, and other post-bubble periods demonstrate that "just wait for the recovery" requires more patience than most investors realize. This is an argument for never paying prices that require perfect execution of an optimistic scenario.


    The Consistent Warning Signs Across All Manias

    Chancellor distills the common warning signs:

    Quantitative Warning Signs

    IndicatorWarning Level
    Market P/E ratioAbove 25x (vs. long-run average ~15x)
    Price-to-book ratioAbove 3x market-wide
    Shiller CAPE ratioAbove 30x
    Price-to-GDP ratio (Buffett Indicator)Above 150%
    IPO volumeMulti-year record highs
    Margin debtRecord highs as % of market cap

    Qualitative Warning Signs

    SignDescription
    New valuation metricsOld metrics "don't apply anymore"
    Taxi driver tipsUnsophisticated investors confidently recommending specific stocks
    Magazine cover curseMainstream media celebrates the mania's leaders
    Extrapolation of recent returns"It's gone up every year for five years"
    Complexity as justificationNew financial products whose complexity obscures risk
    Demographic destiny narratives"Baby boomer investing will keep markets high forever"

    Speculation: Beneficial or Destructive?

    Chancellor engages the genuine debate about speculation's social value:

    The case for speculation:

  • Speculators provide liquidity that allows hedgers to transfer risk
  • Speculation funds genuinely transformative technologies (railroad mania funded railroads)
  • Price discovery: speculators incorporate information into prices, improving resource allocation
  • Risk transfer: futures markets allow farmers to lock in prices, reducing farming risk
  • The case against speculation:

  • Speculative manias misallocate capital (building too many railroads or websites)
  • They redistribute wealth from late-cycle buyers to early-cycle sellers
  • They can destabilize the real economy when credit-financed speculation collapses
  • They generate widespread fraud and corruption during the euphoric phase
  • Chancellor's balanced conclusion:

    Speculation is inseparable from capitalism. Attempts to eliminate it (Bubble Act of 1720, short-selling bans) typically fail and harm legitimate market functioning. The better approach: maintain adequate capital requirements, limit leverage, ensure disclosure, and educate investors about historical patterns.


    Strengths & Weaknesses

    What We Loved

  • Most comprehensive history of speculation in a single accessible volume
  • Japanese bubble chapter is the best available account with direct lessons for modern investors
  • The consistent warning signs distilled from four centuries of evidence
  • Chancellor's writing is scholarly but gripping — the manias are genuinely entertaining stories
  • Published 1999 during the dot-com bubble inflation — his prescience is remarkable
  • Areas for Improvement

  • Does not cover 2000 dot-com collapse or 2008 (published before both)
  • Dense in some historical chapters covering less familiar episodes
  • Limited on policy response — focuses on the manias themselves rather than what should be done

  • Who Should Read This Book

  • Investors who want to recognize bubble conditions using historical patterns
  • Those who want the most comprehensive historical treatment of speculative manias
  • Readers of Manias, Panics, and Crashes who want narrative depth
  • Anyone who wants to understand Japan's financial history and its implications
  • Probably Not For

  • Complete beginners wanting practical investment guidance
  • Those primarily interested in personal finance rather than market history

  • Frequently Asked Questions

    Q: Is this better than Manias, Panics, and Crashes for understanding bubbles?

    A: Different strengths. Kindleberger's book provides the theoretical framework (Minsky model) and systematic analysis. Chancellor provides richer narrative detail and qualitative warning signs. Read both for the complete picture.

    Q: Is Japan's experience relevant to other countries?

    A: Directly relevant. Japan's Lost Decade provided the template for what to avoid post-2008. Bernanke's Fed acted aggressively in 2008-2009 partly to avoid Japan's policy errors. The lesson applies wherever credit-financed asset bubbles of sufficient size develop.


    Final Verdict

    Rating: 4.6/5

    Devil Take the Hindmost is the richest narrative history of speculative manias available. Its consistent warning signs, the Japanese bubble account, and the railroad mania analysis provide genuinely valuable investment education. Every investor who wants to recognize bubble conditions before they become obvious should read it.

    Get Your Copy

    Paperback: Buy on Amazon

    Kindle: Buy on Amazon

    Prices current as of publication date. Free shipping available with Prime.

    Topics

    #book-review#edward-chancellor#speculation#financial-history#bubbles#south-sea#railroad-mania#dot-com

    Get Your Copy

    Support Savvy Nickel by purchasing through our affiliate link.

    Buy on Amazon

    Related Articles