*Disclosure: This article contains affiliate links. If you purchase through these links, we may earn a commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend books we genuinely believe in.
Quick Overview
Edward Chancellor is a financial journalist and historian who wrote Devil Take the Hindmost as the dot-com bubble was inflating — an act of extraordinary prescience. The book traces speculative manias from 17th-century Amsterdam through South Sea, Mississippi, railroad, 1920s, and Japanese bubbles to the emerging internet mania. Chancellor demonstrates that speculation is not a modern aberration but a persistent feature of capitalist economies — and that the specific patterns of each mania are remarkably consistent across four centuries.
Book Details
| Attribute | Details |
|---|
| Title | Devil Take the Hindmost: A History of Financial Speculation |
| Author | Edward Chancellor |
| Publisher | Plume |
| Published | 1999 |
| Pages | 368 |
| Reading Level | Intermediate |
| Amazon Rating | 4.5/5 stars |
Get Your Copy
Paperback: Buy on Amazon
Kindle: Buy on Amazon
About the Author
Edward Chancellor is a financial journalist, historian, and investment advisor. After writing Devil Take the Hindmost, he worked as a financial strategist at GMO (Jeremy Grantham's firm) where he wrote extensively on investment bubbles and valuation. He is the author of The Price of Time (2022), a comprehensive history of interest rates. He is widely regarded as one of the best historical analysts of speculative markets.
The Anatomy of a Speculative Mania
Chancellor identifies consistent characteristics across every speculative mania in history:
The Preconditions
1. Easy credit: Every major mania was preceded by an expansion of credit that made speculation more accessible.
2. A genuine new opportunity: Manias rarely occur around purely fraudulent opportunities. The railroads were genuinely transformative. The internet genuinely changed commerce. Japanese land scarcity was real. The speculative excess builds on a true foundation.
3. A plausible narrative: Each mania develops a story that explains why this time is different — why old valuation metrics do not apply and new ones are needed.
4. New participants: Retail investors who have no experience with the cycle's darker phase enter near the peak, having seen only the gains.
The Development Pattern
| Stage | Characteristics |
|---|
| Quiet accumulation | Informed early investors buy as credit expands |
| Public excitement | Media coverage increases; narrative spreads |
| Mass participation | Retail investors enter; new financial products created |
| Euphoria | Valuations detach from fundamentals; skeptics dismissed |
| Distribution | Informed investors exit; maintain appearances of commitment |
| Collapse | Credit contracts; forced selling; narrative collapses |
| Aftermath | Fraud exposed; regulations enacted; industry restructured |
The Historical Manias
Amsterdam: The World's First Stock Exchange (1630s-1690s)
Amsterdam created the institutional infrastructure for modern capitalism: the world's first joint-stock company (VOC, 1602), the world's first securities exchange (1611), short selling, options, futures, margin lending, and market manipulation. All the features of modern markets existed in 17th-century Amsterdam.
The tulip mania (1634-1637):
Chancellor's tulip account goes deeper than most. The mania occurred in a specific context:
An outbreak of bubonic plague had killed significant portions of the populationSurviving heirs had inherited unusual wealthA new commodity (tulip bulbs with unusual color patterns from a virus) was genuinely scarce and genuinely prized by the wealthyA futures market developed that allowed speculation on bulbs not yet in existenceThe futures market was the crucial innovation: it allowed speculation far beyond the physical supply of bulbs. Contracts on future-delivery bulbs circulated among speculators who had no intention of taking physical delivery — pure financial speculation on price.
The collapse:
In February 1637, a routine bulb auction in Haarlem failed to attract buyers at the asking price. Word spread. Within days, the entire futures market collapsed. Most contracts were never fulfilled. The Dutch legal system, overwhelmed by the volume of contract disputes, ultimately refused to enforce many of the futures contracts — treating them as gambling debts.
The enduring lessons:
Futures markets can sustain speculation far beyond physical supply constraintsWhen futures contracts are not legally enforceable, counterparty risk is unlimitedMass speculative manias can develop for apparently trivial assets if the social and credit context is rightThe South Sea Bubble (1720)
Chancellor provides the most thorough account of the South Sea Bubble available in a popular book.
The structural mechanics:
The South Sea Company was granted a monopoly on British trade with South America. The real business never amounted to much — Spain controlled South America and had no interest in granting access to British traders. The real business was financial engineering: the company was converting British government debt into South Sea shares.
The convertibility mechanism:
Britain's government had accumulated enormous debt from the wars of the previous two decades. The South Sea Company offered to take over this debt in exchange for shares. Holders of government bonds could exchange them for South Sea shares. The company's profits (ostensibly from the trade monopoly) would service the converted debt.
Why the price spiral:
The company itself controlled the share price during the conversion phase. It lent money to buyers of its own shares (using the shares as collateral). Rising share prices made the collateral more valuable, allowing more lending, which funded more buying, which drove prices higher. A perfectly circular price inflation that required continuously rising prices to function.
When the circle broke:
When the directors began selling their own shares in August 1720, the market detected the distribution. The Bank of England refused to extend further credit. The price collapsed from £1,000 to £150 within weeks.
The human consequences:
Thousands of small investors lost their life savingsIsaac Newton, who had initially sold at a profit and then re-entered, lost £20,000Parliament passed the Bubble Act, restricting joint-stock company formation — a law that hampered legitimate business formation for over a centuryThe investment lesson:
When insiders begin selling while publicly encouraging buying, distribution is underway. The specific mechanism (share lending, convertibility) can make this difficult to detect. Watching for insider selling relative to insider buying is a valuable signal.
The Railroad Manias (1825, 1845, 1860s, 1890s)
Chancellor is among the first historians to document that there were multiple distinct railroad manias, not just one. Each mania funded genuine railroad construction. Each also massively overbuilt routes and overpriced securities. Each ended in widespread bankruptcy.
The pattern:
| Phase | Activity |
|---|
| Innovation | First railways prove commercially viable |
| Enthusiasm | Projectors propose hundreds of new lines |
| Parliamentary approval | Government authorizes most proposed lines |
| Capital raising | Share subscriptions oversubscribed |
| Construction frenzy | Tens of thousands of workers employed |
| Rate wars | Too many lines compete for traffic |
| Bankruptcy | Most lines cannot service their construction debt |
| Reorganization | Strongest lines absorb weaker ones at distressed prices |
The railroad investors who did best were not those who bought the original shares at peak enthusiasm — they were those who bought the reorganized companies' bonds at distressed prices after the crash.
Application to modern technology:
The internet bubble of 1995-2000 followed this pattern precisely. Enormous overinvestment in fiber optic infrastructure. Most companies went bankrupt. The fiber, however, remained — purchased in bankruptcy by successors who deployed it at zero marginal cost. The technological transformation was real; the share prices at peak were not justified.
The 1920s and the 1929 Crash
Chancellor's account of the 1920s mania is enriched by comparison to the earlier manias:
New financial products of the 1920s:
Investment trusts (closed-end funds with leverage)Instalment credit (buying on margin)Holding companies (complex pyramids of ownership)The leverage amplification:
Investment trusts of the 1920s used leverage — borrowing to increase their share portfolios. When the market rose 50%, a 2x leveraged trust rose 100%. When the market fell 50% in 1929-1932, a 2x leveraged trust was wiped out.
Goldman Sachs Trading Corporation:
Goldman created multiple investment trusts in 1929, raising money from the public and investing it in other investment trusts (including other Goldman trusts). When the crash came, this pyramid of leverage amplified losses spectacularly. Goldman Sachs's reputation did not recover until after World War II.
The Japanese Bubble (1985-1990)
Japan's experience provides the most instructive modern case study because it combined stock market and real estate mania simultaneously — and the aftermath (the "Lost Decade") shows what happens when policy fails to address the bust.
The scale of Japanese asset inflation (1985-1990):
| Asset | Price Change |
|---|
| Tokyo Stock Exchange (Nikkei) | +238% |
| Tokyo commercial real estate | +300%+ |
| Imperial Palace grounds | Estimated value: more than entire California |
At peak, the total notional value of all Japanese real estate was five times the total value of all U.S. real estate, despite Japan being 1/25th the land area.
The crash:
The Bank of Japan raised rates in 1989. The Nikkei peaked at 38,916 in December 1989. By August 1992 it had fallen to 14,309 — a 63% decline. Real estate followed more slowly but fell equally dramatically.
The aftermath — the Lost Decade:
Japan's policy response to the bust was inadequate:
Banks were not forced to recognize bad loans (zombie banks)Interest rates were cut but transmission was blocked by bank balance sheet problemsFiscal stimulus was inadequate and poorly targetedJapan's Nikkei did not recover its 1989 peak for 35 years — until 2024. Real estate in many areas never recovered.
The investment lesson:
Asset price bubbles of sufficient size can produce multi-decade recoveries. The Great Depression, Japan's Lost Decade, and other post-bubble periods demonstrate that "just wait for the recovery" requires more patience than most investors realize. This is an argument for never paying prices that require perfect execution of an optimistic scenario.
The Consistent Warning Signs Across All Manias
Chancellor distills the common warning signs:
Quantitative Warning Signs
| Indicator | Warning Level |
|---|
| Market P/E ratio | Above 25x (vs. long-run average ~15x) |
| Price-to-book ratio | Above 3x market-wide |
| Shiller CAPE ratio | Above 30x |
| Price-to-GDP ratio (Buffett Indicator) | Above 150% |
| IPO volume | Multi-year record highs |
| Margin debt | Record highs as % of market cap |
Qualitative Warning Signs
| Sign | Description |
|---|
| New valuation metrics | Old metrics "don't apply anymore" |
| Taxi driver tips | Unsophisticated investors confidently recommending specific stocks |
| Magazine cover curse | Mainstream media celebrates the mania's leaders |
| Extrapolation of recent returns | "It's gone up every year for five years" |
| Complexity as justification | New financial products whose complexity obscures risk |
| Demographic destiny narratives | "Baby boomer investing will keep markets high forever" |
Speculation: Beneficial or Destructive?
Chancellor engages the genuine debate about speculation's social value:
The case for speculation:
Speculators provide liquidity that allows hedgers to transfer riskSpeculation funds genuinely transformative technologies (railroad mania funded railroads)Price discovery: speculators incorporate information into prices, improving resource allocationRisk transfer: futures markets allow farmers to lock in prices, reducing farming riskThe case against speculation:
Speculative manias misallocate capital (building too many railroads or websites)They redistribute wealth from late-cycle buyers to early-cycle sellersThey can destabilize the real economy when credit-financed speculation collapsesThey generate widespread fraud and corruption during the euphoric phaseChancellor's balanced conclusion:
Speculation is inseparable from capitalism. Attempts to eliminate it (Bubble Act of 1720, short-selling bans) typically fail and harm legitimate market functioning. The better approach: maintain adequate capital requirements, limit leverage, ensure disclosure, and educate investors about historical patterns.
Strengths & Weaknesses
What We Loved
Most comprehensive history of speculation in a single accessible volumeJapanese bubble chapter is the best available account with direct lessons for modern investorsThe consistent warning signs distilled from four centuries of evidenceChancellor's writing is scholarly but gripping — the manias are genuinely entertaining storiesPublished 1999 during the dot-com bubble inflation — his prescience is remarkableAreas for Improvement
Does not cover 2000 dot-com collapse or 2008 (published before both)Dense in some historical chapters covering less familiar episodesLimited on policy response — focuses on the manias themselves rather than what should be done
Who Should Read This Book
Highly Recommended For
Investors who want to recognize bubble conditions using historical patternsThose who want the most comprehensive historical treatment of speculative maniasReaders of Manias, Panics, and Crashes who want narrative depthAnyone who wants to understand Japan's financial history and its implicationsProbably Not For
Complete beginners wanting practical investment guidanceThose primarily interested in personal finance rather than market history
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Is this better than Manias, Panics, and Crashes for understanding bubbles?
A: Different strengths. Kindleberger's book provides the theoretical framework (Minsky model) and systematic analysis. Chancellor provides richer narrative detail and qualitative warning signs. Read both for the complete picture.
Q: Is Japan's experience relevant to other countries?
A: Directly relevant. Japan's Lost Decade provided the template for what to avoid post-2008. Bernanke's Fed acted aggressively in 2008-2009 partly to avoid Japan's policy errors. The lesson applies wherever credit-financed asset bubbles of sufficient size develop.
Final Verdict
Rating: 4.6/5
Devil Take the Hindmost is the richest narrative history of speculative manias available. Its consistent warning signs, the Japanese bubble account, and the railroad mania analysis provide genuinely valuable investment education. Every investor who wants to recognize bubble conditions before they become obvious should read it.
Get Your Copy
Paperback: Buy on Amazon
Kindle: Buy on Amazon
Prices current as of publication date. Free shipping available with Prime.